Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kapellmeister"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Westarctica (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
An excellent point... I am of your point of view that he need not attend council meetings or be involved in other governmental discussions. So, you are correct that he should not have a seat on the Royal Council. However, as a "department head" under the Ministry of Culture, he still holds the deputy position in order of precedence. | An excellent point... I am of your point of view that he need not attend council meetings or be involved in other governmental discussions. So, you are correct that he should not have a seat on the Royal Council. However, as a "department head" under the Ministry of Culture, he still holds the deputy position in order of precedence. | ||
::Thank you for the clarification--[[User:DukeBearPeninsula|DukeBearPeninsula]] ([[User talk:DukeBearPeninsula|talk]]) 14:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 14:44, 2 April 2020
I'm just trying to understand. During the Constitutional Convention, we removed Deputy Ministers from having a role on the Royal Council, due to inflating the number of moving parts in time-sensitive votes. Is this no longer to be the case? Or is the role of Kapellmeister actually a Council Level Position on the Royal Council. I'm just trying to understand so I know which way the edits need to go.
An excellent point... I am of your point of view that he need not attend council meetings or be involved in other governmental discussions. So, you are correct that he should not have a seat on the Royal Council. However, as a "department head" under the Ministry of Culture, he still holds the deputy position in order of precedence.
- Thank you for the clarification--DukeBearPeninsula (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)