9,927
edits
Westarctica (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:[[User:Westarctica]]: I realized after creating a number of articles on geographic features/ places not connected to Westarctica that I had strayed rather far afield with my work, and that several of them could not really be categorized into Geography of Westarctica, meaning maybe they didn't even really belong in the Encyclopedia at all. I didn't leap in to delete them, as I thought the information might still be useful, but I have made a recent effort to limit my geography pieces to places and things that are more directly connected to the Motherland (or is it Fatherland? Was a decision ever made regarding the gender of the country? Please advise!) [[User:Baron of Bastanchury|Baron of Bastanchury]] ([[User talk:Baron of Bastanchury|talk]]) 02:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC) | :[[User:Westarctica]]: I realized after creating a number of articles on geographic features/ places not connected to Westarctica that I had strayed rather far afield with my work, and that several of them could not really be categorized into Geography of Westarctica, meaning maybe they didn't even really belong in the Encyclopedia at all. I didn't leap in to delete them, as I thought the information might still be useful, but I have made a recent effort to limit my geography pieces to places and things that are more directly connected to the Motherland (or is it Fatherland? Was a decision ever made regarding the gender of the country? Please advise!) [[User:Baron of Bastanchury|Baron of Bastanchury]] ([[User talk:Baron of Bastanchury|talk]]) 02:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
:[[User:Baron of Bastanchury]]: Sorry, I just now saw this.. | |||
Yes, I agree completely, and I saw the recent delete. As I go through, I'm weeding out links to things that aren't really relevant, but I don't think we need to necessarily delete articles that have already been written. Travis - 3 May 2018 |