1,183
edits
Difference between revisions of "User talk:DukeBearPeninsula"
User talk:DukeBearPeninsula (view source)
Revision as of 14:46, 27 December 2018
, 14:46, 27 December 2018no edit summary
(→Response to Query regarding Government article: response) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Please know that I appreciate your efforts and participation, and did not mean my question to come across as pointed (if it did). I somehow missed the talk page discussion you mentioned. Since we cannot upload SVG files as images, the graphic is, as you pointed out, not easily edited, and quickly becomes out of date (there is no place in it, for example, for the title Captain-General of Calsaharah, though the title certainly belongs there somewhere). I wonder if there is not some way to remedy this (not the SVG part, the editing part) but I don't know what that might be. I am certainly willing to spend some time revising and updating the graphic, and I think the article is better ''with'' such an image than ''without'' one, but not to the extent that it contains information which becomes inaccurate. I do not want to create it anew only to see it removed again, however! Thoughts? [[User:Baron of Bastanchury|Baron of Bastanchury]] ([[User talk:Baron of Bastanchury|talk]]) 00:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC) | * Please know that I appreciate your efforts and participation, and did not mean my question to come across as pointed (if it did). I somehow missed the talk page discussion you mentioned. Since we cannot upload SVG files as images, the graphic is, as you pointed out, not easily edited, and quickly becomes out of date (there is no place in it, for example, for the title Captain-General of Calsaharah, though the title certainly belongs there somewhere). I wonder if there is not some way to remedy this (not the SVG part, the editing part) but I don't know what that might be. I am certainly willing to spend some time revising and updating the graphic, and I think the article is better ''with'' such an image than ''without'' one, but not to the extent that it contains information which becomes inaccurate. I do not want to create it anew only to see it removed again, however! Thoughts? [[User:Baron of Bastanchury|Baron of Bastanchury]] ([[User talk:Baron of Bastanchury|talk]]) 00:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC) | ||
* It didn't come across pointed. I just tried to be thorough, in my response. My directness may have come across as brusque. If so I apologize, as that was not my intent, either. I agree that such a diagram could be a good addition. I simply feel that as government changes, grows, and becomes more efficient, that this may become a time-suck, as well as confusing (Full disclosure: if I happen to be elected Prime Minister, I'm hoping to oversee a lot of growth and changes in efficiency). I wonder if it might not be better to forgo it, to avoid such a drain on your time. At the end of the day, it's your call. It just comes down to whether this is a project you want to expend the effort to keep up on. [[User:DukeBearPeninsula]] | |||